Free Website Traffic

Sneaky way to get traffic via Twitter

We’ve been noticing that many heavy traffic news and other mass media sites have been posting tweets to them via @.  I guess the rationale for this is to get a “pulse” of what readers feel about late breaking news, current trends, and genuine feedback.  Interestingly, more and more of these types of setup are being hit hard by irrelevant, obviously commercial tweets.

Looks like a few of these newspaper tweet sites are unmanaged.  Bad move.  You don’t want your newspaper readers saying “Cool, XXXX newspaper is now selling Tramadol online” LOLz.

Photo Credits:  Dr Stephen Dann

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
Share on Facebook

Review: Retweet It

Your Circle of Influence

Twitter can be viewed as a series of circles of influence. When someone elects to follow me, they become a member of my circle of influence–they get a copy of my updates or tweets. When someone follows them they have their own circle of influence who get their tweets. And so on and so forth. Normally, these circles are not interconnected. Following only goes one way although many people follow you if you follow them (I do this as a matter of policy–I reward people for following me by following them).

Enter the Retweet aka RT

Retweets are tweets made by a person you are following that you then tweet and send to your followers. The practical effect of retweeting is that it a) gives you content to send to your followers and b) it increases the size of the audience of the person you’re retweeting. Retweeting is one of the major marketing benefits of Twitter. It has the potential of giving you access, based on the quality of your content/tweet, to THOUSANDS of people.

The Retweet Problem

Unfortunately, Retweeting is not automatic. The people in your circle of influence sporadically and casually retweet only items they find of interest. The rate of retweet cannot organically be gauged or controlled.

The ReTweet.It Solution

Retweet.It is a retweet exchange service. It is free. It works this way: For every retweet you make of other retweet.it members’ tweets, you get a credit. You can use your credits to post your tweets to their system. Other members then retweet you for credits. There is some quality control in this process because the self-interest of the Retweet members prevents them from blindly retweeting spam–this erodes their own circle of interest’s loyalty. So they tend to gravitate to retweeting quality content. Notice that the RT requests for real content gets RT’ed more than spamtastic requests?

Some ReTweet.It Tips

Retweet only quality content. While you’re getting points to do this, you’re also tweeting to your base of followers. Don’t piss them off by retweeting garbage. Quality content builds your twitter base and builds your credibility in the Twittersphere.

Post only quality content. We ran tests on our tweets on Retweet.It and found that high quality articles such as Google Trends Scam and Critiques of Online Traffic Methods get more traffic than other tweets. If you need quality viral content, visit this Website Copywriting service

Measure Measure Measure. Check your stats and see which types of tweets get the most RT traction. Focus on those topics/tweet types and repeat the process.

Happy Retweeting!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
Share on Facebook

Conflicting priorities: SEO vs Social Media

When it comes to ease of reading, there’s an unstated but very real conflict between SEO copywriting and social media writing.  SEO copywriting’s main focus is, unsurprisingly, search engine optimization.  While reader enjoyment and retention are nice goals to have, an SEO’d copy’s primary reader, at least in the Old School days, is the Search Engine bot.  Googlebot reads text differently.  (Judging from ranking reports from the latest update, its reading skills have recently improved with the use of LSI technology.)  Consequently, the structure and presentation of various elements of the article/blog entry need to appeal to search engine bots and oftentimes, the user’s reading experience sometimes suffers.

Social media writing, on the other hand, focuses on the user experience.  Digg and Mixx are filled with social media-centric articles.  They all share the same characteristic–fun topics, easy to scan, highly segmented, etc.  The traffic from these articles don’t come primarily from search engines but from users passing on the link to their circles of influence.  Using Digg and Twitter, a user can explode the views of one social media piece if it is viral enough.  With that said, writing elements of a social media piece often run counter to old school SEO canon of keyword/subkeyword driven text.

The challenge for SEO copywriters is to bridge the two often conflicting requirements of social media and SEO content.  The answer here lies at the core–content value.  Work from that common feature and you’d be surprised how you can address the needs of both SEO and Social media.  Viral content that appeases the great SE Spider gods–that is your goal!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
Share on Facebook

Twitter updates @ functionality

Twitter has updated its @ setting so that people who follow an account will no longer see that account’s @ replies.  However, people can still see account names mentioned with @ as long as it’s not a direct reply.  Here’s an example:

Replies @account won’t show:  If an account you’re following replies to @account, the message to @account won’t show in your feed.

Mentions of @account will show:  If an account you’re following posts an update that mentions @account, you’ll see that in your feed

Twitter’s system couldn’t handle the load so they were technically pushed to this solution.

Personally, I think this is a good solution.  It still offers serendipity, minimizes @ noise, and prevents calculated @ sniping.  Hopefully, this update won’t ignite (yet again) moans that “Twitter is Worthless“.  Twitter isn’t worthless… how can it be?  It makes me money :)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
Share on Facebook

Is Twitter Worthless?

is twitter worthlessTwitter is growing currently at the phenomenal rate of almost 1000%.   However, there is a disturbing twin figure to that 1000% growth rate:  a dismal retention of only 30%.  By contrast, Facebook retains around 70% of its users, a similar figure to some other social networking sites.  This disconnect between rapid adoption rates and bad retention rates invites the question: Is Twitter Worthless as a direct marketing tool?

I see Twitter’s low retention rates impacting non-targeted tweet campaigns primarily. For those who build twitter profiles that zero in on particular demographics or use twitter to maintain an ongoing conversation with people looking for specific content, retention is not a problem. I run quite a few mainstream blog accounts on twitter (my main twitter account http://twitter.com/websitewriters is not one of my blog accounts) and let me tell you–less is more. Sounds very Zen, right? I focus on a lower number of users for my own blogs’ twitter pages but feed them the info they need. In terms of monetization success, I run Adsense on these blogs and we’re looking at many $3 clicks, sometimes higher. Per click. Targeting is key. Also, since the person is following you and listening to you, as long as you satisfy their content preferences and you do it strategically (sending out updates that have high relevance but also high PPC value), your effort is rewarded.

Variation in Twitter marketing results

Other marketers’ results will vary of course. Variation results from niche (is your target market looking for info or are they impulse buyers?), how you find and target people to follow/recruit, how active you are in sending @ and if the @ messages also have relevance to people looking at your tweet feed or the tweet feed of the people responding to your @ I can’t say it’s a consistent cash cow right now but it is a source of income that can be a nice component in your overall multi-traffic/multi-revenue stream overall strategy.

Thanks for the Twitter image: IconTexto Webdev Social Bookmark

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
Share on Facebook